Everything College Sports

For those interested in all things college sports

Collegiate Athletics Not Escaping Economic Concerns

The current state of the economy has people buzzing not only in Washington, but around college campuses all over the country as well. As institutions are coping with decreasing state aid and dwindling endowments, tough decisions are being made on every campus and athletics has not been immune. To date, six Division I institutions have officially dropped a total of 10 sports for the 2009-10 academic year. Unfortunately, the dropping of sports will only increase as institutions process the realities of their FY10 budgets.

If you look at the Division I institutions that have officially announced the dropping of sport programs for FY10 [Portland State, Wagner, Pepperdine, Northern Iowa, Vermont, Iona], none of these schools are considered Division I powerhouses. Couple the fact that they all have limited budgets and resources with an economic downturn, and you create a recipe for needing to make tough and radical decisions. Having been involved in the wrestling community most of my life, I am certainly not an advocate for dropping sport programs.

However, as a Division I administrator trying to balance minimum NCAA schedule requirements, safety and the experience of hundreds of student-athletes, I have come to understand that there does come a point where it is not possible to continue to cut operating budgets in an effort to avoid cutting sports. There does come a point, where the continual cut of staff and operating budgets not only compromises what we consider a Division I experience, but also potentially the safety of student-athletes. Additionally, the reality of this economic climate means limited opportunities to increase revenue to off-set any budget cuts. As a result, some institutions are left with few choices other than to drop sports.

At the same time, other units on campus are faced with similar difficult choices. The economy has forced our institutions to take a more business-like approach to every function on our campuses, from Student Affairs to academic units. Academic units on our campuses have also had to take a look at their program offerings. Colleges and academic departments are being reorganized, combined or discontinued. Idaho, Arizona State, and Florida are among schools that have dropped or are discussing dropping several academic programs [please see links below]. While the discussion regarding academic programs may not be making as many headlines, we need to remember that athletics is not the only unit on campus that is being forced to make some difficult decisions in light of the current economy.

http://www.uiargonaut.com/content/view/7324/48/

http://www.azfamily.com/family/education/top/stories/phoenix-local-news-021009-asu-cuts-enrollement.28396e9.html

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20090327/ARTICLES/903271007/1002?Title=A-worst-case-budget-for-UF-cuts-140-jobs-

Advertisements

March 27, 2009 - Posted by | College Sports Business, Finance, Uncategorized |

1 Comment »

  1. But Tricia–if we would simply manage costs better in athletic programs we would not be having near the problems we continually have. The arms race is real and it is out of control. The nebulous Division I experience I constantly hear about is beginning to bother me. What exactly is that? and why has that become a battle cry? Frankly it is a copout for dropping sports IMHO–why you ask, because a Division I experience cannot be defined by any measure. The experience as athlete gets in the MAC will not be the same as one in the SEC-no matter how you slice it. Yet here at Ohio we used the “Division I experience” factor as a reason to do that–when in reality we were (prior to you) spending money we didn’t have. Playing sports is a privilege not a right and you get the experience you can afford and provide. If that means no indoor facility, bus trips, and yes even sleeping in your own bed the night before a home game (don’t get me started on that one) might be part of a Division I experience here at Ohio. We cannot play in a card game we have no chance of winning.

    College sports is a business, but it is a bad business model. Broad based participation and a meaningful educational experience for more athletes, not less should be our goal. People at the mid major level chasing the elusive George Mason dream (in which their ROI has virtually disappeared) is a pipe dream and we, and others, should be satisfied where we are, competing at our level, once in great while doing something nationally while giving everyone an experience that will be worthwhile and beneficial. Athletic departments are a place where there can be cuts without dropping sports, we just have to have the guts to make them.

    Comment by B. David Ridpath | April 11, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: